M. Timofeeva
To Win
F. Gettwart
To Win
Fabienne Gettwart vs Lucie Petruzelova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L W L W L L L
Form
W W L L L W W W L LHead To Head: Gettwart 1 - 0 Petruzelova
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gettwart winning 2 and Petruzelova winning 0. The last match between Gettwart and Petruzelova was at the W15 Alkmaar, 22-06-2022, First, Clay with Fabienne Gettwart getting the victory 6-0 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fabienne Gettwart | 1 |
| Lucie Petruzelova | 0 |
W15 Alkmaar(22-06-2022)
6
0
6
4
| Gettwart | Stats | Petruzelova |
|---|---|---|
| 20% (2-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 635 | Ranking | N/A |
| 476 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 29 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (145-105) | Career Total W/L | 40% (50-74) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alexandrova VS Kasatkina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tiafoe VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gettwart VS Petruzelova H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-4 |
Stats 
Fabienne Gettwart
Player
Lucie Petruzelova
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
Gettwart VS Petruzelova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:28:0 | Average Match Time | 1:28:0 |
| 58% (42/72) | 1st Serve % | 54% (26/48) |
| 71% (30/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (13/26) |
| 40% (12/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 27% (6/22) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (2/10) |
| 60% (29/48) | Return Points Win % | 42% (30/72) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Fabienne Gettwart Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ilinca Dalina Amariei
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
78%
(
29 of
37)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Kuczer
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristina Kroitor
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabienne Gettwart
Player
Milena Ciocan
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Josy Daems
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabienne Gettwart
Player
Romane Longueville
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shuo Feng
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
44%
(
43 of
97)
1st Serve %
72%
(
80 of
111)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
10
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
47 of
80)
33%
(
18 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
111)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Avdeeva
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
3
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
7
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lucie Petruzelova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 3-6 13-11 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Pia Lovric
Player
Lucie Petruzelova
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucie Petruzelova
Player
Enola Chiesa
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucie Petruzelova
Player
Noka Juric
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
13
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 3-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kate Fakih
Player
Lucie Petruzelova
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Milatova
Player
Lucie Petruzelova
47%
(
27 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (145/105) | Win/Loss | 40% (50/74) |
| 56% (321/249) | Sets Win/Loss | 42% (116/163) |
| 52% (2751/2510) | Games Win/Loss | 47% (1205/1358) |
| 50% (11/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 44% (15/19) |
| 61% (114/73) | Clay Win/Loss | 40% (29/43) |
| 49% (20/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (6/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 192 | Aces Total | 52 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 726 | Total Double Faults | 139 |
| 1:23:55 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 439.34 | Average Opponent Rank | 346.32 |
| 68% (9148/13514) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1894/3140) |
| 57% (5195/9148) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (1056/1894) |
| 44% (1904/4366) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (551/1246) |
| 50% (933/1874) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (173/373) |
| 48% (6552/13511) | Return Points Win % | 44% (1339/3018) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (44/48) | Challenger W/L | 34% (10/19) |
| 64% (101/57) | Futures W/L | 42% (40/55) |
| 58% (143/248) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (50/123) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (21/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 23% (3/13) |
| 54% (39/72) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (16/32) |
| 91% (136/124) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (58/46) |
| 9% (136/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (58/12) |
| 18% (114/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (66/4) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
